Download PDF
Send Feedback
Print

Introduction to Rebound Hammer Test

The rebound hammer test, also known as the Schmidt hammer test, is a non-destructive testing method used in civil engineering to evaluate the surface hardness and compressive strength of concrete structures. It works on the principle that the rebound of an elastic mass depends on the hardness of the surface against which the mass strikes.

The test provides a quick and economical means of checking the uniformity of concrete, identifying areas of poor quality or deteriorated concrete, and estimating the in-situ strength of concrete without causing damage to the structure. It is widely used for both quality control during construction and for assessment of existing structures.

Important Note

The rebound hammer test is standardized under several codes including IS:13311 (Part 2)-1992 in India, ASTM C805 in the USA, and EN 12504-2 in Europe. While it's a valuable tool for assessing concrete quality, it should be used in conjunction with other testing methods for critical structural evaluations.

Why We Conduct Rebound Hammer Test

The rebound hammer test is conducted for several important reasons in concrete quality assurance and structural assessment:

Quality Control

To verify the uniformity of concrete quality throughout a structure and ensure it meets the specified strength requirements during construction.

Defect Identification

To locate areas of deteriorated or substandard concrete within a structure, helping identify regions that may require repair or further investigation.

Strength Estimation

To provide a non-destructive estimate of concrete compressive strength in existing structures where core cutting would be impractical or undesirable.

Time-Related Changes

To monitor changes in concrete properties over time, helping evaluate the effects of aging, environmental exposure, or structural damage.

Structural Assessment

To assist in the overall condition assessment of existing structures, particularly after events like earthquakes, fires, or when planning renovations.

Construction Control

To determine when formwork can be removed safely, when post-tensioning can be applied, or when structures can be put into service.

Limitations

While the rebound hammer test is valuable, it has limitations: it only assesses the surface hardness to a depth of approximately 30mm, can be affected by surface conditions, and provides relative rather than absolute strength values. For critical structural assessments, it should be used alongside other methods like ultrasonic pulse velocity tests or core testing.

Required Equipment

The following equipment is required to conduct a proper rebound hammer test:

Rebound Hammer

The primary testing instrument. Various models are available (Type N for general testing, Type L for low-impact testing, etc.), each with different impact energies.

Calibration Anvil

A hardened steel anvil used to verify the hammer is properly calibrated before each testing session.

Surface Preparation Tools

Abrasive stone for smoothing rough surfaces and a wire brush for cleaning the test area.

Marking Tools

Chalk, marker, or crayon for marking test points and a ruler or template for consistent spacing.

Recording Materials

Data sheets or digital device for recording test results, including rebound numbers and location information.

Calculation Tools

Charts, correlations, or software for converting rebound numbers to estimated compressive strength.

Standard Specifications

The rebound hammer test is standardized under various codes and specifications globally. These standards provide guidelines for conducting the test, interpreting results, and ensuring reliability.

Standard Country/Region Key Requirements
IS:13311 (Part 2)-1992 India Minimum 10 readings per test location, separation of 20-25mm between test points, test surface should be smooth and clean
ASTM C805/C805M USA Minimum 10 readings per test area, all readings outside the median ±6 range should be discarded, impact direction correction required
EN 12504-2 Europe Minimum 9 readings per test area, spacing of 25mm between impacts, discard readings ±20% from median value
BS 1881-202 UK Minimum 12 readings per test area, test points at least 20mm from edges, smoothing of rough surfaces required
ACI 228.1R USA (ACI) Provides guidelines for correlating rebound numbers to compressive strength, recommends calibration curves for specific concrete mixes
Important Note

While these standards provide general correlations between rebound number and compressive strength, it's recommended to develop site-specific correlations by comparing rebound numbers with actual core test results for the specific concrete mix under investigation.

Step-by-Step Procedure

Follow these steps to conduct a proper rebound hammer test as per standard guidelines:

  1. Equipment Calibration

    Before testing, verify the rebound hammer's calibration using the calibration anvil. Take at least 10 readings on the anvil, and ensure they fall within ±3 points of the manufacturer's specified value. If not, the hammer needs service.

  2. Surface Preparation

    Select a smooth, flat test area free from defects. If the surface is rough, grind it smooth with an abrasive stone. Clean the area thoroughly to remove dust or loose material. The test area should be at least 20mm away from edges or obvious defects.

  3. Grid Marking

    Mark a grid pattern for test points with at least 20-25mm spacing between points and from edges. A test area should have at least 10-12 test points. For large structures, select multiple test areas to assess uniformity.

  4. Hammer Positioning

    Hold the rebound hammer firmly and perpendicular to the test surface. Note the orientation of the hammer (horizontal, vertical upward, vertical downward, or at an angle), as this affects the readings and will require correction factors.

  5. Impact and Reading

    Gradually increase pressure on the plunger until the hammer impacts. Maintain pressure and lock the plunger position. Read and record the rebound number from the scale. Release the locking mechanism after recording.

  6. Multiple Readings

    Take at least 10 readings at different points within the test area, maintaining the required spacing. Avoid taking readings on visible voids, reinforcement locations, or areas with obvious defects.

  7. Data Analysis

    Calculate the average of all readings for each test area. According to standards, discard readings that differ from the average by more than 6 units or by ±20% (depending on which standard you follow), and recalculate.

  8. Apply Correction Factors

    Apply necessary correction factors based on:
    - Hammer orientation (horizontal, vertical upward/downward, or at an angle)
    - Concrete age (if testing young concrete)
    - Carbonation depth (if significant carbonation is present)
    - Member shape and size (if testing thin members)

  9. Strength Conversion

    Convert the corrected rebound number to estimated compressive strength using appropriate conversion curves provided by the manufacturer, relevant standards, or site-specific correlations. Document all results.

Factors Affecting Test Results

Several factors can influence rebound hammer test results, potentially affecting their accuracy and reliability:

Hammer Orientation

Readings vary significantly with the direction of impact (horizontal, vertical upward, vertical downward). Apply appropriate correction factors for non-horizontal orientations.

Concrete Age

Older concrete tends to give higher rebound values due to surface carbonation. Young concrete (less than 28 days) might require age correction factors.

Moisture Content

Wet surfaces give lower rebound values compared to dry surfaces of the same concrete. Consistent moisture conditions are essential for comparable results.

Carbonation

Surface carbonation increases rebound values without corresponding increase in strength. Carbonation depth should be measured and accounted for in older structures.

Surface Texture

Rough surfaces produce inconsistent and generally lower readings. Always test on smooth, ground surfaces for reliable results.

Concrete Density

Lightweight concrete gives different rebound values compared to normal-weight concrete of the same strength. Standard correlations may not apply.

Impact Point

Testing over reinforcement, aggregate, or voids can significantly affect readings. Always avoid visible aggregates, reinforcement, and visible defects.

Temperature

Extreme temperatures can affect hammer mechanism and concrete surface properties. Avoid testing in freezing conditions or on very hot surfaces.

Correlation Between Rebound Number and Compressive Strength

The relationship between rebound number and compressive strength is not linear and depends on various factors. Different researchers and standards have proposed different correlation curves. Here's how rebound number typically relates to compressive strength:

Horizontal Orientation
Vertical Downward (+90°)
Vertical Upward (-90°)

The graph shows how the same rebound number can indicate different compressive strengths depending on the orientation of the hammer. Some key observations include:

Rebound Number Range Approximate Strength Range (MPa) Concrete Quality Assessment
< 20 < 14 Very Poor
20-30 14-20 Poor
30-40 20-30 Fair
40-50 30-42 Good
> 50 > 42 Excellent
Important Note

The above correlations are approximate and based on general relationships. For accurate assessments, it's highly recommended to develop project-specific correlation curves by comparing rebound numbers with actual core test results from the same concrete mix.

Sample Calculation

Let's walk through a complete sample calculation for rebound hammer testing of a concrete column:

Sample Data

Test location: Reinforced concrete column, 30 years old
Hammer orientation: Horizontal (0°)
Carbonation depth: 5mm (measured using phenolphthalein indicator)

Reading No. Rebound Value
136
238
335
434
537
628
739
836
934
1037
1135
1236

Calculation Steps:

  1. Calculate Average Rebound Number

    Average = (36 + 38 + 35 + 34 + 37 + 28 + 39 + 36 + 34 + 37 + 35 + 36) ÷ 12 = 35.4

  2. Check for Outliers

    According to ASTM C805, readings outside the range of the median ±6 should be discarded.
    Median = 36
    Range = 36 ±6 = 30 to 42
    Reading #6 (28) is outside this range and should be discarded.

  3. Recalculate Average

    New Average = (36 + 38 + 35 + 34 + 37 + 39 + 36 + 34 + 37 + 35 + 36) ÷ 11 = 36.1

  4. Apply Carbonation Correction

    Carbonation affects rebound readings by increasing surface hardness without proportionally increasing strength.
    Carbonation Correction = 5mm × 0.5 = 2.5
    Corrected Rebound Number = 36.1 - 2.5 = 33.6

  5. Convert to Compressive Strength

    Using the standard correlation formula for horizontal orientation:
    Compressive Strength (MPa) = 1.25 × e0.073 × Rebound Number
    Compressive Strength = 1.25 × e0.073 × 33.6 = 25.3 MPa

  6. Determine Concrete Class

    Based on the estimated compressive strength of 25.3 MPa, the concrete would be classified as M25 grade concrete.

Quality Assessment

Conclusion

The corrected rebound number is 33.6, corresponding to an estimated compressive strength of 25.3 MPa. This indicates "Fair to Good" quality concrete, suitable for most structural applications. The concrete is classified as M25 grade, which meets common requirements for reinforced concrete structures.

Using the Rebound Hammer Calculator

Our Rebound Hammer Calculator simplifies the entire testing process by automating calculations, applying correction factors, and providing instant quality assessments. Here's how the calculator works:

Rebound Hammer Calculator

Rebound Hammer Calculator Preview

The calculator features a user-friendly interface that allows you to:

  1. Multiple Test Locations

    The calculator supports testing at multiple locations (Location 1, 2, 3), allowing you to assess different areas of a structure and calculate an overall average.

  2. Input Parameters

    For each location, you can specify:
    - Hammer orientation (horizontal, upward, downward, or at angles)
    - Concrete age (optional)
    - Carbonation depth (optional)
    - Individual rebound readings (minimum 10 recommended)

  3. Automatic Calculations

    The calculator automatically:
    - Filters outlier readings according to standard protocols
    - Calculates average rebound number
    - Applies orientation correction factors
    - Adjusts for concrete age and carbonation
    - Converts to estimated compressive strength
    - Determines concrete strength class (M15, M20, M25, etc.)
    - Provides quality assessment (Poor, Fair, Good, Excellent)

  4. Results Presentation

    The results are displayed in a comprehensive table showing:
    - All input parameters
    - Number of valid readings used
    - Average and corrected rebound numbers
    - Estimated compressive strength
    - Concrete strength class
    - Quality assessment with color-coded indicators

  5. Documentation Features

    The calculator also offers:
    - PDF report generation for professional documentation
    - Saving of results for future reference
    - Calculation of average strength across multiple test locations

Open Rebound Hammer Calculator

Interpreting Results & Common Issues

Properly interpreting rebound hammer test results is crucial for making informed decisions about concrete quality and structural integrity:

Result Interpretation

Rebound Number Estimated Strength (MPa) Concrete Quality Typical Applications
< 20 < 14 Very Poor Requires immediate attention, possibly unsafe for structural use
20-30 14-20 Poor Non-structural applications, may need repair if structural
30-40 20-30 Fair to Good Suitable for most structural applications
40-50 30-42 Very Good High-strength applications, heavy-duty structures
> 50 > 42 Excellent Special high-strength applications

Result Variability Assessment

Uniform Concrete (CoV < 10%)
Moderately Variable (CoV 10-15%)
Highly Variable Concrete (CoV > 15%)

The coefficient of variation (CoV) of rebound readings at a location provides valuable information about concrete uniformity. Low CoV indicates uniform concrete, while high CoV suggests quality control issues or deterioration.

Common Issues & Troubleshooting

Issue Potential Cause Solution
Highly variable readings Poor concrete uniformity, improper testing technique, or surface defects Increase number of test points, check surface preparation, verify hammer operation
Unexpectedly low readings Surface moisture, honeycombing, improper hammer orientation, or concrete deterioration Ensure dry surface, check for internal voids, verify orientation, inspect for deterioration
Unexpectedly high readings Surface carbonation, presence of large aggregate, or over-troweled surface Measure and correct for carbonation, avoid visible aggregate, select representative areas
Inconsistent results between tests Different testing personnel, hammer calibration issues, or varying surface conditions Standardize testing protocol, verify calibration regularly, document test conditions
Professional Judgment

Rebound hammer testing should be considered as one tool in a comprehensive assessment approach. For critical structures or when results are ambiguous, always supplement with other NDT methods or core testing. Professional judgment by qualified engineers is essential when interpreting results.

Practical Applications of Rebound Hammer Testing

The rebound hammer test finds practical applications across various civil engineering contexts:

New Construction QC

Verifying concrete quality during construction, confirming strength development, determining when formwork can be removed, and ensuring specification compliance.

Structural Assessment

Evaluating the condition of existing structures, identifying areas of concrete deterioration, and establishing prioritization for maintenance or repairs.

Post-Disaster Evaluation

Rapid assessment of concrete structures after earthquakes, fires, floods, or explosions to determine structural integrity and safety for occupancy.

Renovation Planning

Assessing the strength and quality of concrete in structures planned for renovation, adaptive reuse, or load modifications.

Long-term Monitoring

Tracking changes in concrete properties over time to monitor aging, environmental effects, or structural performance.

Research Applications

Studying concrete performance under various conditions, evaluating new mix designs, and developing improved correlation models.

Case Study Example

Ground Floor
Middle Floors
Top Floor

The graph above shows data from a case study of a 30-year-old building where rebound hammer testing was conducted across different floors. The test revealed:

Combined Testing Strategies

While the rebound hammer test is valuable, combining it with other testing methods provides a more comprehensive assessment of concrete quality and strength:

Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV)

Combining rebound hammer with UPV testing (known as the SonReb method) significantly improves strength estimation accuracy and helps detect internal defects.

Core Testing

Taking cores from a few selected locations based on rebound hammer results provides actual strength data and allows development of site-specific correlation curves.

Carbonation Testing

Phenolphthalein spray tests to measure carbonation depth help correct rebound readings and assess concrete durability against reinforcement corrosion.

Cover Meter

Using a cover meter to locate reinforcement ensures rebound testing avoids rebar locations, which could otherwise produce misleading results.

Visual Inspection

Thorough visual inspection complements instrumental testing by identifying cracks, spalling, efflorescence, and other visible signs of deterioration.

Statistical Analysis

Advanced statistical treatment of test results from multiple methods provides confidence intervals and reliability metrics for strength estimates.

Best Practice

The most reliable assessment strategy typically involves initial rapid screening with rebound hammer testing across the entire structure, followed by more detailed investigation using other NDT methods in critical areas, and finally, selective core testing to verify findings at key locations.

References & Resources

For further information on rebound hammer testing, refer to the following standards and resources:

×

Thank You!

Thanks for your feedback Karthik. We'll review your suggestions.