Concrete cube testing is a critical quality control measure in construction projects. It ensures that the concrete used meets the required strength and durability specifications. This training module covers the comprehensive process of concrete cube preparation, curing, testing, and analysis of results.
Training Duration: 3 days
Prerequisite Skills: Basic knowledge of concrete materials and properties
Relevant IS Codes: IS 456:2000, IS 516:1959, IS 1199:1959, IS 10086:1982
Concrete cube testing serves as a fundamental quality assurance measure for construction projects. It provides quantitative evidence of concrete performance and helps ensure structural safety.
- Quality Control: Ensures concrete meets design strength requirements
- Regulatory Compliance: Fulfills building code requirements and contract specifications
- Early Detection: Identifies potential strength issues before they become structural problems
- Mix Design Verification: Confirms concrete mix performance in actual field conditions
- Safety Assurance: Provides documented evidence of structural safety
- Legal Protection: Serves as evidence in case of disputes or failures
- Potential structural failures due to undetected weak concrete
- Regulatory non-compliance leading to penalties or stop-work orders
- Increased liability and insurance issues
- Difficulty defending against claims in case of structural problems
- Limited ability to identify and correct mix design issues
Critical Note: Cube testing is not just a regulatory requirement but a critical safety measure. Never proceed with major concrete works without a proper testing regime in place.
IS Code |
Title |
Key Provisions |
IS 456:2000 |
Plain and Reinforced Concrete - Code of Practice |
Establishes overall concrete quality requirements, acceptance criteria, and sampling frequency |
IS 516:1959 |
Method of Tests for Strength of Concrete |
Defines procedures for making, curing, and testing concrete specimens |
IS 1199:1959 |
Methods of Sampling and Analysis of Concrete |
Details sampling procedures and frequency for different concrete volumes |
IS 10086:1982 |
Specification for Moulds for Use in Tests of Cement and Concrete |
Specifies requirements for standard cube moulds |
IS 4031 (Part 6) |
Methods of Physical Tests for Hydraulic Cement |
Related to compressive strength testing of cement |
- Standard Cube Size: 150mm × 150mm × 150mm for aggregates up to 38mm size
- Alternative Size: 100mm cubes for aggregates smaller than 20mm
- Tolerance: ±0.2mm for cube dimensions
- Testing Ages: 7 days and 28 days (standard), with optional 3, 14, or 56-day tests
- Loading Rate: 140 kg/cm²/minute (13.72 MPa/minute)
Quantity of Concrete (m³) |
Minimum Samples |
Frequency |
1-5 |
1 |
Every 5m³ |
6-15 |
2 |
Every 7.5m³ |
16-30 |
3 |
Every 10m³ |
31-50 |
4 |
Every 12.5m³ |
50+ |
4 + 1 for each additional 50m³ |
As required |
Note: Each sample consists of a minimum of 3 cubes for testing at 28 days, plus additional cubes if testing at different ages is required.
Acceptance Criteria (IS 456:2000):
1. Individual test results: ≥ fck - 3 N/mm²
2. Average of 4 consecutive test results: ≥ fck + 0.825 × established standard deviation (or ≥ fck + 3 N/mm² if standard deviation is unknown)
Where fck is the characteristic compressive strength
- Cube Moulds: 150mm × 150mm × 150mm standard size (as per IS 10086:1982)
- Tamping Rod: 16mm diameter × 600mm length with rounded ends
- Vibrating Table: For proper compaction of concrete
- Trowel: For filling and finishing cube surfaces
- Slump Cone: For checking concrete workability
- Weighing Scale: Accurate to ±0.1% of specimen weight
- Compression Testing Machine: Capacity of at least 2000 kN
- Curing Tank: With temperature control (27°C ± 2°C)
- Thermometer: For monitoring curing water temperature
- Mould Oil/Release Agent: For easy demoulding
- Material: Cast iron or steel with minimum 0.15 cm wall thickness
- Tolerance: ±0.2mm on internal dimensions
- Flatness: 0.03mm maximum deviation
- Squareness: Angle between adjacent faces 90° ± 0.5°
- Base Plate: Machined smooth with thickness ≥ 10mm
- Assembly: Easily dismantlable with proper alignment features
- Joints: Watertight when assembled
- Capacity: Minimum 2000 kN for standard cubes
- Accuracy: ±2% of the indicated load
- Loading Rate: Capable of applying load at 140 kg/cm²/minute
- Platens: Hardened steel with minimum HRC 58
- Calibration: Annually certified by authorized agency
Equipment Maintenance: Regularly check cube moulds for damage, deformation, or rust. Clean thoroughly after each use and apply a light coating of oil before storage. Ensure CTM is calibrated at least annually as per IS requirements.
- Take samples at the point of placement, not directly from the mixer
- Collect at least 3 portions from different parts of the batch/delivery
- Mix these portions thoroughly to form a composite sample
- Use the sample within 30 minutes of collection
- Protect sample from sun, wind, and contamination
- Record batch details, time of sampling, and slump value
- Clean moulds thoroughly to remove any debris or hardened concrete
- Check mould dimensions and alignment
- Apply a thin layer of mould release agent or oil
- Assemble mould parts securely with bolts/clamps
- Ensure joints are tight to prevent leakage
- Place moulds on a level, non-absorbent surface
Proper casting ensures representative specimens with minimal voids and proper compaction.
- Step 1: Fill the mould in three equal layers (approximately 50mm each)
- Step 2: Compact each layer with 35 strokes of the tamping rod for 150mm cubes (25 strokes for 100mm cubes)
- Step 3: Distribute tamping strokes uniformly over the surface
- Step 4: Ensure the rod penetrates into the underlying layer by about 25mm
- Step 5: Alternative method: Use vibrating table for 2 minutes after filling
- Step 6: After compaction, strike off excess concrete with a trowel
- Step 7: Smooth and level the top surface
- Step 8: Mark each cube for identification (batch, date, location)
Important: Over-vibration can cause segregation while under-vibration leaves voids. For table vibration, stop when cement paste appears at the surface. For hand tamping, ensure consistent energy for all specimens.
- Keep cubes in moulds for 24 ± 4 hours after casting
- Maintain temperature between 22°C and 32°C (preferably 27°C ± 2°C)
- Protect from vibration, shocks, and dehydration
- Cover with wet burlap/plastic sheets to prevent moisture loss
- Keep away from direct sunlight, heaters, and cold drafts
- After 24 hours, demould cubes carefully
- Mark identification details on the cube surface
- Immediately place in curing tank/pond
- Maintain water temperature at 27°C ± 2°C (as per IS 516)
- Ensure cubes are fully submerged with minimum 15cm water above cubes
- Add lime (2g/liter) to water to prevent leaching
- Change water every 28 days or when it appears dirty
- Monitor and record water temperature daily
- Cure until the testing age (typically 7 and 28 days)
- Remove cubes from water 30 minutes before testing
- Wipe surface water and grit from the cubes
- Test while the cubes are still in a damp condition
- Record curing duration to the nearest hour
Site Curing vs. Lab Curing: When comparing site concrete performance with laboratory mixes, both sets of specimens should receive identical curing. For site quality control, cubes should be cured under standard conditions rather than site conditions to ensure consistent reference standards.
- Measure and record dimensions of the cube to nearest 0.2mm
- Calculate average area of the loaded faces
- Weigh the cube to nearest 0.01kg (optional but recommended)
- Check for visible defects (honeycombing, improper curing)
- Record any abnormalities or deviations
- Step 1: Clean the testing machine platens
- Step 2: Place the cube centrally on the lower platen
- Step 3: Align the cube so that the load is applied perpendicular to the casting direction
- Step 4: Bring the upper platen to make slight contact with the cube
- Step 5: Apply load at a constant rate of 140 kg/cm²/minute (13.72 MPa/minute)
- Step 6: Continue loading until the cube fails
- Step 7: Record the maximum load at failure
- Step 8: Note the failure pattern (conical, splitting, etc.)
Calculate compressive strength as follows:
- Formula: Compressive Strength (N/mm²) = Maximum Load (N) / Cross-sectional Area (mm²)
- Report: Express the result to nearest 0.5 N/mm²
- Average: Calculate average of three cubes from same sample
- Validation: Discard result if difference between highest and lowest exceeds 15% of average
Failure Pattern |
Description |
Possible Cause |
Conical Failure |
Symmetrical hourglass/cone shape on both sides |
Proper testing; satisfactory result |
Columnar Vertical Cracking |
Vertical cracks running through the cube |
Proper testing; satisfactory result |
Diagonal Shear |
Diagonal cracks from corner to corner |
Improper specimen preparation or misalignment |
Premature Edge Failure |
Edges failing before achieving full strength |
Improper capping, uneven surface, or misalignment |
Layered Failure |
Horizontal splitting into layers |
Improper compaction between layers during casting |
Critical Testing Parameters: The loading rate is crucial - too slow or too fast can significantly affect results. Always maintain 140 kg/cm²/minute (13.72 MPa/minute) ± 10% as per IS 516. Use calibrated equipment and train operators properly.
For concrete strength up to M25, the following criteria must be satisfied:
- Individual Test: Strength of any individual sample ≥ (fck - 3) N/mm²
- Average Strength: Average of four consecutive samples ≥ (fck + 0.825 × established standard deviation) or (fck + 3) N/mm² if standard deviation is unknown
- Variability: Coefficient of variation should not exceed 15%
Where fck is the characteristic compressive strength specified.
When cube test results fail to meet the acceptance criteria, a systematic approach must be followed:
- Immediate Notification: Inform all stakeholders (client, contractor, designer)
- Verify Testing: Check testing procedure and equipment calibration
- Retest Remaining Cubes: If available, test companion cubes
- Suspend Further Concreting: For the same mix until investigation is complete
- Review Records: Check batching, mixing, and placing records
- Non-Destructive Testing: Perform tests on the actual structure
- Core Testing: Extract cores from the structure if necessary
- Structural Assessment: Evaluate impact on structural capacity
- Remedial Measures: Determine if strengthening is required
Test Type |
Applicable IS Code |
Purpose |
Approximate Cost (INR) |
Core Testing |
IS 516:1959 |
Direct measurement of in-situ strength |
4,000-6,000 per core |
Rebound Hammer |
IS 13311 (Part 2) |
Surface hardness correlation to strength |
1,500-2,500 per location |
Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity |
IS 13311 (Part 1) |
Internal integrity and relative strength |
3,000-5,000 per location |
Load Test |
IS 456:2000 |
Structural performance evaluation |
50,000-2,00,000 per element |
Penetration Resistance |
ASTM C803 |
Surface strength indication |
2,000-3,000 per location |
Pull-Out Test |
ASTM C900 |
In-situ strength correlation |
4,000-6,000 per location |
Note: Costs are approximate and may vary based on location, number of tests, and service provider.
Ground mounting for equipment foundations requires special attention to strength development:
- Early Strength: Minimum 75% of 28-day strength before mounting heavy equipment
- Foundation Contact: 100% bearing area contact with ground/mounting plates
- Grouting: Non-shrink grout with minimum strength equal to concrete
- Verification: Early cube tests at 3 days, 7 days before mounting
Decision-Making Framework: The final decision on accepting concrete with strength below the specified value should be based on:
1. Margin of failure (how much below specification)
2. Structural significance of the affected element
3. Proportion of the structure affected
4. Results of supplementary testing
5. Structural engineer's assessment and recommendations
- Cube ID: Unique identification number for each set of cubes
- Concrete Mix: Grade, design mix proportions, source of materials
- Casting Details: Date, time, location, ambient conditions
- Sampling Location: Structural element, batch/truck number
- Fresh Concrete Properties: Slump, temperature, workability
- Curing Conditions: Method, duration, temperature records
- Testing Information: Age, date, time, technician name
- Test Results: Dimensions, weight, maximum load, strength
- Failure Pattern: Description or photograph
- Evaluation: Compliance status, comments on abnormalities
A comprehensive cube test report should include the following sections:
Section |
Information to Include |
Project Information |
Project name, location, client, contractor, consultant |
Concrete Details |
Mix designation, supplier, batch time, delivery ticket number |
Sampling Information |
Date, time, location, weather conditions, structure element |
Fresh Concrete Tests |
Slump, temperature, density, air content (if applicable) |
Specimen Information |
Number of cubes, dimensions, identification markings, weight |
Curing Details |
Curing method, dates, temperature records |
Test Results |
Test age, date, maximum load, compressive strength, failure type |
Compliance Evaluation |
Comparison with specification, acceptance status |
Remarks |
Any abnormalities, deviations, or additional observations |
Authentication |
Testing technician name, supervisor, laboratory identification |
For larger projects, maintain statistical records to track concrete quality:
- Mean Strength: Average of all test results for each mix
- Standard Deviation: Measure of variation in strength results
- Coefficient of Variation: (Standard Deviation / Mean) × 100%
- Control Charts: Plot strength trends over time
- Strength Development Ratio: 7-day strength to 28-day strength
- Compliance Percentage: Proportion of results meeting criteria
Records Retention: Cube testing records should be maintained for the entire defect liability period or minimum 5 years, whichever is longer. Electronic storage with proper backups is recommended alongside physical documentation.
Stage |
Common Errors |
Impact on Results |
Sampling |
Non-representative sample, delayed casting |
Inconsistent results, higher variability |
Casting |
Inadequate compaction, improper filling |
Lower strength due to voids, honeycombing |
Mould Preparation |
Leaking joints, inaccurate dimensions |
Misshapen specimens, incorrect calculations |
Curing |
Incorrect temperature, insufficient moisture |
Stunted hydration, lower strengths |
Testing |
Incorrect loading rate, misalignment |
Artificially high/low results |
Calculation |
Incorrect area calculation, rounding errors |
Incorrect strength reporting |
- Low Strength, Good Consistency: Mix design or material quality issue
- Variable Results, Some Low: Improper sampling or testing procedures
- Strength Dropping Over Time: Cement quality or storage issues
- 7-Day Strong, 28-Day Weak: Improper curing after 7 days
- Abnormal Failure Pattern: Testing machine or specimen preparation issues
- Higher Density but Lower Strength: Aggregate quality issues
- Consistently Just Below Specification: Conservative mix design
- Personnel: Train technicians properly and regularly
- Equipment: Calibrate testing machines annually
- Moulds: Check dimensions periodically
- Environment: Control testing room temperature (27°C ± 2°C)
- Curing: Use temperature-controlled tanks with lime water
- Sampling: Follow IS 1199 procedures strictly
- Testing: Maintain correct loading rate
- Verification: Check calculations and records before reporting
- Quality System: Implement standard procedures and checklists
Critical Warning: Even small procedural errors can significantly impact test results. A 10% error in strength can be the difference between acceptance and rejection. Always follow standardized procedures, use calibrated equipment, and have proper oversight of testing operations.
A 40-story high-rise building project in Mumbai faced cube test failures in the raft foundation. Initial 7-day strength results were 60% of expected strength rather than the typical 70-75%.
- Investigation: Analysis revealed abnormally high ambient temperature (38°C) during casting
- Action Taken: Core samples showed in-situ strength was actually higher than cube results
- Root Cause: Cubes were improperly cured in the first 24 hours (left exposed to sun)
- Corrective Measure: Established temperature-controlled initial curing area
- Outcome: Subsequent batches showed normal strength development
- Lesson: Initial 24-hour curing is critical, especially in extreme weather
A major highway bridge project had inconsistent cube results from the same batch for pier concrete, with 30% variation between highest and lowest strength.
- Investigation: Laboratory audit revealed improper tamping techniques by new technicians
- Action Taken: Non-destructive testing (UPV) conducted on actual structure
- Root Cause: Inconsistent compaction during cube preparation
- Corrective Measure: Re-training of laboratory staff, implementation of vibrating table
- Outcome: Coefficient of variation reduced to under 8%
- Lesson: Standardized procedures and proper training are essential
A heavy industrial equipment foundation required early strength verification before equipment mounting.
- Requirement: 80% of design strength required at 14 days for early mounting
- Approach: Accelerated curing tests performed alongside standard curing
- Process: Cubes tested at 3, 7, and 14 days to establish strength development curve
- Validation: Rebound hammer correlations established for in-situ verification
- Outcome: Equipment mounted at 16 days after confirming 82% strength achievement
- Benefit: Project schedule accelerated by 12 days
Practical Insight: For critical structural elements, consider casting extra cubes beyond the minimum requirement. These serve as "insurance" for potential investigations if standard cubes fail or show unusual results. The small additional cost provides significant risk reduction.
Effective on-job training is crucial for ensuring that technicians and engineers can consistently perform concrete cube testing to the highest standards, minimizing errors and ensuring reliable results.
- Theoretical Foundation: Review of IS codes, concrete properties, and the 'why' behind each step.
- Hands-on Practice: Supervised practice in sampling, mould preparation, casting, compaction, and curing.
- Equipment Familiarization: Proper handling, operation, and basic troubleshooting of moulds, tamping rods, vibrating tables, and CTM.
- Error Recognition: Training on identifying common errors during casting (e.g., segregation, honeycombing) and testing (e.g., incorrect loading, misalignment).
- Documentation & Reporting: Emphasis on accurate record-keeping, filling out reports, and understanding acceptance criteria.
- Safety Protocols: Training on safe handling of concrete, equipment, and working in the lab environment.
- Qualified Trainers: Ensure OJT is conducted by experienced and certified laboratory technicians or civil engineers.
- Structured Modules: Break down the training into manageable modules with clear learning objectives for each stage of testing.
- Regular Assessments: Conduct practical assessments and written tests to verify understanding and skill proficiency.
- Feedback Mechanism: Provide constructive feedback to trainees and allow for iterative practice until proficiency is achieved.
- Refresher Training: Implement annual or bi-annual refresher courses to reinforce best practices and update on new standards.
- Mentorship Program: Pair new technicians with experienced mentors for ongoing guidance and support.
- Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs): Ensure all OJT is based on clear, written SOPs that align with IS codes.
OJT Impact: Poor OJT can lead to inconsistent testing, unreliable results, and ultimately, compromised structural quality. Investing in robust OJT directly contributes to the overall quality assurance of concrete work on site.
Concrete cube testing is a fundamental quality control process that provides critical information about concrete performance. Following standardized procedures for cube preparation, curing, and testing is essential for reliable results that ensure structural safety and durability.
Remember that cube tests are representative samples that predict the performance of much larger volumes of concrete in the actual structure. Proper attention to detail at every stage—from sampling to testing and interpretation—is necessary to make informed decisions about concrete acceptance.
Regular training, proper equipment maintenance, and adherence to relevant IS codes are the cornerstones of an effective concrete testing program. When test results indicate potential issues, a systematic approach to investigation and decision-making helps maintain structural integrity while avoiding unnecessary delays or costs.